In Chapter 2, after a long description of the college he attended, the protagonist begins to tell the story of the time he took a trustee of the university for a drive. Immediately my mind went to the first chapter of How to Read Literature Like a Professor, Every Trip is a Quest (except when it's not). The chapter in question lists the key components to a Quest as being:
- a quester
- a place to go
- a stated reason to go there
- challenges and trials
- and the real reason to go
The quester in this particular case is obviously the protagonist. The place to go is back to the college. The stated reason is so Mr. Norton can get back to his class/be treated for his illness/important things. The challenges and trials are of particular interest. At first, the trip appears to be a fairly relaxing drive in which Mr. Norton tells our protagonists something interesting to influence the rest of his life, etc. Things quickly change for the worse when Mr. Norton experiences a range of inexplicable emotions, with the trip culminating in a rowdy bar with some mental patients. These trials are fairly Odyssian in terms of structure, with multiple trials in the form of islandesque stops along the way, ending in a trial of acceptance once the questers get home. (also worth noting the framing of the journey with the same description found in the beggining)
The final component, the real reason for the trip, has yet to be explained, but there are multiple points of interest being foreshadowed. Mr. Norton's reaction to the sharecropper and illness have yet to be explained (actually maybe his reaction is explainable-- ideas for next post), and his comments about the protagonist's future will most definitely be answered. The true mystery is in Dr. Bledsoe's reaction to the situation.
I think I'll leave this subject to rest until I finish this arc of the story. (also book is really good, not sure if I mentioned that).